Distributional Welfare Impacts of Public Spending: The Case of Urban versus National Parks

This study examines the optimal allocation of funds between national and urban parks.Since DEODORANT FOREST travel costs to national parks are significantly higher than to urban parks, poor households tend to visit the latter more frequently, whereas rich households favor the former.Therefore, allocating public funds to improving the quality of national parks at the expense of urban parks disproportionately benefits high income households.

By developing a theoretical model and implementing it using Israeli data, findings indicate all households, except for the richest decile, prefer that the park authority divert a larger proportion Face Mist of its budget from national to urban parks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *